Regarding 2-1-1

S.O

Regarding 2-1-1

When you call this 2-1-1, 3-1-1, or even 4-1-1, try to get the last name and I.D number of the operator. An operator is not someone who answers phones or someone who asked for your information only, these are people who facilitate a case and hearing. The situation is very interesting in California but in Texas, the situation is not primary concern, does not mean it does not exist.

2-1-1- services are useful as access to employment, housing, for charity foundation, for petition for foster parenting, for benefits and there are available resources for English speakers and Spanish speakers who are no longer a stream - or a main stream. There are bane and useful allegation materials that required conditioned reasoning and both parties, but in so far as selling picture provisions to web houses and to channels, there are capital punishment which I encourage for citizens victimized in such and such specific ways.

Unlike human trafficking and forced loss of custody of Kids - many of them have no idea where the kids are and are not aware of those handling cases of foster parenting, 2-1-1, 3-1-1, may assist and facilitate the process. Unlike CASA cases of adoption, or disabled clients and those in homeless shelters or within the precinct of the Police and the law, there are direct Texas based consequences in handling private information and use and abuse of secondary information. In essence, human trafficking and sex expletive behaviors are gradually common and gradually infused into the run of the State and city Municipality.

For that reason, 2-1-1 operators must begin with last name and I.D before proceeding, and the other end of the spectrum can record details of the discussion. Under regular circumstances 2-1-1 operators are a not a problem, but there sufficient cases of attrition that need not to be second guessed.

In fact, work related corrective assumptions are legally binding and like arrest warrants, they can only signed, documented and handled by district attorneys and by the bench - for only a stated period of time. Report cases of neglect in trying to reach your constituencies and government workers. Report unusual assault on any worker through means not provisioned by the constitution and by the City or the State. Let it written that actions extremely dicey to the interest of the State or the City will be ruthlessly dealt with, even it emerges for hints of contaminations with 2-1-1 and 3-1-1 operators.  

The Patriot Act forbid the behavioral selective aptitude and is within reason that you provide sufficient information to the operator - yours and theirs. Haven said that, I don't believe people are fully aware of the use and abuse of the laws of Texas to start with or City ordinances to speak for, especially for supervised cases - care must be taken to ensure that private information is protected at all cost.

Look, in my experience handling Case-managers - at least before 2005 -, there are case managers that hold private information for the length of their career and it is then and now considered action against the interest of the State. 2-1-1 cornered by private Charity hardly represent best intention, and only time like many leaders mention will prove if the rain falls.

2-1-1 Operators are not the culpable interesting group, 3-1-1, also, and also private managers considers 'un-suable' or considered members of a Charity Foundation over-stating their interest. It is not your right to even tamper with social security number or I.D for any justifiable length and for any reason. We will prosecute any such hints - even for prison cases.

This is a crime, a big crime and grounds for felony and believe in the acquired to thorough look into these allegations,  especially if the attachment is ongoing and continues. Why this is necessary is that Social Security numbers in U.S - not in Africa - is considered personal property but sometimes, we must argue that in other to prosecute certain cases, there is an attachment involved.

It is against the interest of the Law and the people of Austin to use municipal attrition and State level acting, to obtain private information or prosecute primary lines of businesses in any County and in any City in U.S. It is against the law for 2-1-1 operators to select emergency reasons for calling police or sending assistance of nay kind. These are Felony grounds for prosecution and job termination.

Welfare Commission and Article 1942 was established with conscientious roles of Charity Foundations - who do not pay taxes in Texas or any State - on many counts including zero tolerance for selective interest (zero), with protective interest of personal and client's disclosures. No censorship is necessary for clients without two or more parties involved, especially the case of respondent party who are to answer to citations of any kind.

There are cases of prosecution which must increase their effort to see this happen as regular as possible and with result. Unofficially locking information or tagging private information is a sickness Austin Police forbidden to engage - forbidden unless so directed by a seating judge and for a specific period of time.

The link of services between informed operators and conscientious interesting group, is a information network liable to the law and city ordinance for all classes of municipal order, especially 2-1-1, whether the information is moved elsewhere or not or private privileges and corrective measures enacted. Societies grow and public advocates exist with the health of employment.  

Whatever may be the problem with information network, you are advised to first obtain the information from 2-1-1 operator - in fact operators must FIRST volunteer information (name and I.D number) before commencing a discussion - the reasons are Pure Play and if there are hints of sabotage you should make your reports known to the Texas Police, to district Attorney or any State Actor, and hire an attorney quickly.  

S. Onwuka

The Web of Debt - Ellen Hodgson Brown, J.D

Title - The Web of Debt

Author - Ellen Hodgson Brown, J.D

Year – 2010, pagination 544

Publisher – Third Millennium Press

Review - Sampson Iroabuchi Onwuka

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published set of minimal capital adequacy requirements called Basel I. Ellen Hodgson Brown J.D place the essence of her book on how Basel I dealing with the consequences of New Deal gave grounds to Basel II with enough emphasis on Commodities future Trading and the CFTC that was a response to the dynamics of the 70’s. 

The author discusses the impact of Basel I Committee on Banking and supervision where the committee resolves to classify some of the problems of state and inner city municipal budget “…according to risk, and that the banks had to maintain “capital” (money of their own, not just their depositors’)  roughly equal to 8% of these “risk-weighted” assets.” 

The premier argument of the risk-weighting of 1 be at least 8% tend to suggest that $8.00 of every $100, whereas loans. It is standard business attitude to argue for the higher role of banks in business environment of the world, especially the impact of the money reserved for day to day transaction as it relates to the confidence of investors. 

It is a late argument given what specifically transpired has taken place of the last few decades, to a point that it could be safe to assert that the economic environment for Basel I is perhaps a meeting experiment for Basel II, and perhaps a meeting standard for Basil III. 

The basis on Basel I is the bank’s responsibility to challenges facing most cities and states in the world, especially the web of obligation and debt repay rate is better explained through the market problems of 2008, when a small fraction of to meet their debt requirements and to stress the test for risk in budget planning and analysis and important clearing details in banks operation and supervision. 

Several transformations of most European Banks beginning with the end of World War I or at least the beginning of the War in 1904 tender to the history of the Banking in Europe for over a century, especially how State Banks took the uniform of investment banks and to a large extent commercial ordinals which could force the markets. 

According to the author, “The office of the comptroller of the currency reported that in mid-2006, there were close to 9, 000 commercial and savings banks in the United States, yet 97 percent of U.S bank-held derivatives were concentrated in the hands of just five banks.” 

Yet in Basel II agreement and control of quantity of money expose an underlying need for transparency in national currency in market place and for other issues that require details of attention. 

Professor Henry C.K Liu – once quoted that China escaped the 1998 ‘Asian Crisis’ “China was saved from such a dilemma because the yuan was not free convertible. In a fundamental way, the Chinese Miracle of the past half a decade has been made possible by its fixed exchange rate and currency control…” and “…makes the yuan fully convertible at floating rates.”

The connection between quantity of money theory exercised in the 70’s and its adopted by the Federal Reserve in handling emergent properties creates the space for additional CDO repository. It shifted the attention of money supply from one means to another – from investment banks with money backed grants from commercial and central banks. 

This did not only solution the problems of saving rate and the rate of inflation and flight of cash; it produces the realities of banks too big to fail, or banks with domineering impact on the world markets.

Short View

The Consequence of a Basel II is the reality that few banks will move to retain control of very small of portions of world markets. The direct relationship between market behavior and impact is the awareness of bank’s rate of saving to loan’s rate both of which has little impact of national GDP. 

But this structure drove the long term view in the market – it makes it clear that the rise of major commercial based tier 3 markets led to the issue of housing and real estate boom. It corrigible to this effect the implied expansion of housing, regenerated for the States and for the Cities the nemesis of single crop markets. 

In essence, there are fewer open markets in the world, and there are more attractive options with housing than anything else in the ordinary markets. 

For this reasons, the age of Basel II which gave impetus to big banks and financial wall trees represented the comfort of long term view which shifted to housing and real estate of control, to shrinking of competitive advantage and the poor correlation between inflation and core CPI and the provisional needs for Basel III.